Home / Family Law / Binding Financial Agreement vs Consent Orders: 4 Key Differences

Binding Financial Agreement vs Consent Orders: 4 Key Differences

binding financial agreement vs consent orders | Dandenong Family Lawyers

When navigating financial settlements during a separation or divorce, you may encounter two key options: Binding Financial Agreements (BFAs) and Consent Orders. Both tools help formalise agreements about financial matters, but they differ significantly in purpose, scope, and legal implications.

What Is a Binding Financial Agreement?

A Binding Financial Agreement (BFA) is a private contract between parties, detailing how assets, liabilities, and finances will be divided. BFAs can be created before, during, or after a relationship. While not filed with the court, they are legally enforceable under the Family Law Act 1975 when prepared correctly.

Advantages of a Binding Financial Agreement:

  • Flexibility: You can include provisions beyond property division, such as spousal maintenance.
  • Privacy: BFAs do not require court involvement, keeping details confidential.
  • Control: You and your partner have greater autonomy over the terms.

Limitations of a Binding Financial Agreement:

  • BFAs must comply with stringent legal requirements to be valid.
  • Legal advice is mandatory for both parties, potentially increasing costs.
  • The court can overturn a BFA if it finds evidence of fraud, duress, or improper execution.

Key Takeaway: A BFA may suit you if privacy and customisation are priorities, but ensure proper legal guidance to safeguard its enforceability.

What Are Consent Orders?

Consent Orders are formalised agreements approved by the Family Court of Australia. They outline arrangements regarding property division, spousal maintenance, or parenting matters, turning your agreement into a legally binding court order.

Advantages of Consent Orders:

  • Court Approval: The court ensures the agreement is fair and complies with legal standards.
  • Enforceability: Breaching a Consent Order can result in legal consequences.
  • Simplified Process: The application is generally straightforward, requiring the submission of prescribed forms and a nominal fee.

Limitations of Consent Orders:

  • Court approval can take time, especially in complex cases.
  • Once approved, changes to the order require further court applications.

Key Takeaway: Consent Orders provide security and enforceability if your agreement aligns with legal principles and you want court oversight.

Need a Lawyer?

Differences Between a Binding Financial Agreement and Consent Orders

  1. Court Involvement:
    • BFAs are private agreements with no court oversight.
    • Consent Orders require court approval, ensuring fairness.
  2. Legal Advice:
    • BFAs mandate independent legal advice for validity.
    • While not compulsory, obtaining legal advice for Consent Orders is strongly recommended.
  3. Scope of Use:
    • BFAs can include broader terms beyond property division.
    • Consent Orders are typically limited to property, finances, and parenting matters.
  4. Enforceability:
    • Consent Orders carry stronger legal enforceability due to court approval.
    • BFAs, while binding, are more susceptible to being overturned.

Key Takeaway: Choosing between a BFA and Consent Orders depends on your needs for privacy, enforceability, and the scope of terms you wish to include.

When Should You Choose a Binding Financial Agreement?

A BFA is ideal if:

  • You prefer to keep financial arrangements private.
  • You need a tailored agreement that goes beyond property division.
  • You are in a de facto relationship and want to avoid court involvement.

However, the drafting and execution process can be intricate, requiring meticulous legal advice to avoid potential invalidation.

Key Takeaway: Opt for a BFA if privacy and customisation outweigh the need for court oversight, but prepare for the associated legal costs.

When Are Consent Orders a Better Option?

Consent Orders are more appropriate if:

  • You seek enforceability with court approval.
  • You have already reached a fair agreement with your partner.
  • You want to avoid the risks of a BFA being overturned.

The process is generally cost-effective compared to prolonged litigation and ensures compliance with Australian family law principles.

Key Takeaway: Choose Consent Orders if you value enforceability and court oversight to finalise your settlement.

Both Binding Financial Agreements and Consent Orders have unique benefits and drawbacks. Your choice depends on your priorities—whether it’s privacy and flexibility or enforceability and court assurance.

Consulting an experienced family lawyer will ensure your agreement is tailored to your circumstances and legally robust.

Scroll to Top