Reasons to Revoke Intervention Order
There are several reasons to revoke an intervention order, which generally involve a significant change in circumstances since the order was made.
Common reasons include reconciliation between the parties, evidence that the order is no longer necessary for protection, or new information that undermines the original basis for the order.
If the protected person no longer feels threatened or at risk, they may request the court to revoke the order, arguing that it has served its purpose or is now unjustified.
Key Takeaway: Intervention orders may be revoked when circumstances change, such as reconciliation, a lack of ongoing threat, or new information that challenges the original need for the order.
Changed Circumstances Between Parties
One of the primary reasons for revoking an intervention order is a change in the relationship between the parties involved.
This could be due to reconciliation, where the parties have resolved their differences and therefore no longer require legal protection.
Alternatively, if the parties have significantly reduced or ceased contact, the protected person may feel the order is no longer necessary.
Key Takeaway: Changes in the relationship, such as reconciliation or reduced contact, can justify revoking an intervention order if the perceived threat has diminished.
Evidence That the Order Is No Longer Necessary
Another reason to seek revocation is the absence of ongoing risk or threat. Suppose the protected person no longer feels at risk, and there have been no incidents of concern for an extended period. In that case, this may be presented as evidence that the intervention order is no longer needed.
The court may consider revocation if it is convinced that the order’s purpose has been fulfilled.
Key Takeaway: Demonstrating that the threat or risk no longer exists is a valid reason to request the revocation of an intervention order.
Need a Lawyer?
New Information or Evidence
If new evidence comes to light that was not available during the initial hearing, this can be a reason to revoke the order.
This might include evidence that disproves the original claims or shows that the respondent was not responsible for the actions that led to the order.
Presenting such information to the court can lead to the revocation of the order if it changes the court’s perspective on the necessity of the order.
Key Takeaway: The emergence of new evidence that undermines the original basis for the intervention order can lead to its revocation.
Mutual Agreement to Revoke the Order
In some cases, both the protected person and the respondent may agree that the intervention order is no longer required.
This mutual agreement can be presented to the court as a reason for revocation.
The court will consider the safety and wellbeing of all parties before making a decision, but mutual consent can be a strong factor in favour of revocation.
Key Takeaway: Mutual agreement between the parties to revoke the order can be a compelling reason for the court to consider lifting the intervention order.
The Process of Revoking an Intervention Order
Submit an Application to the Court:
To begin the revocation process, you must submit a formal application to the same court that issued the intervention order. This application outlines your request to lift the order and initiates the legal process for revocation.
Provide Reasons and Supporting Evidence:
Along with your application, you must present clear reasons for revoking the order. Supporting evidence, such as changes in circumstances or new information, should be included to strengthen your case and demonstrate that the order is no longer necessary.
Attend a Court Hearing:
After the application is submitted, the court will schedule a hearing. During this hearing, both parties can present their arguments and evidence. The court will then consider all the information provided and decide whether to revoke the order.
Key Takeaway: Revoking an intervention order requires submitting an application, providing supporting evidence, and attending a court hearing where both parties can present their cases.
